It is now clear that, as I've held all along (in private conversations if not on the blog), the man-made global warming claim is based on junk science.
Key researchers have now been exposed as having massaged data to get the desired result, destroyed original data, rigged the peer-review process to keep contrary studies from being published--and then turned around an tried to discredit the studies on the ground that they weren't published in peer-reviewed journals--used junk code to analyze data--which even years of trying by a programmer couldn't fix--and flat out broken the law regarding Freedom Of Information requests.
And it's not just this one group of rogue scientists in England and America. The same thing has popped up in other countries.
Unless the next nine decades are very unusual, this is the scientific scandal of the 21st century. This is what Piltdown Man was to the 20th--only vastly worse since unlike Piltdown Man the warm-mongers have embarked upon useless enterprises on a global scale that, if fully implemented, would drastically constrict the world economy and thus (like a government takeover of medical care) kill vast numbers of people due to the effects of economic underdevelopment both in the third world and in the so-called developed countries.
We can only hope that this proves to be a learning experience--for science, for the public, and for the political class--and that the devastations the warm-mongers want to foist on the human population will go by the wayside.
I know there are some who are calling for the hacker(s) or whistle-blower(s) who exposed the data to be prosecuted, but whoever did this is one of the great heroes of science. They should be awarded a Nobel Prize (if nothing else, the peace price for all the lives that stand to be saved). The Roman Senate should vote them a full triumph (not just triumphal ornaments). And they should be given a lifetime supply of carbon.
Climatic Research Unit e-mail hacking incident
Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation
Climategate and Scientific Conduct
Climategate: it's all unravelling now
Scientific Peer-Review is a Lightweight Process
Scientists Are Not Software Engineers
No One Peer-Reviews Scientific Software
1 comment:
Great reading. As a software professional, I especially liked the "Scientists Are Not Software Engineers". It was hilarious.
Post a Comment